Studying the Brain from the Inside Out
Posted on 12/11/2008 | 0 Comments
Ever find one of those websites you just can't stop going to? A few months ago a friend sent me a link to TED - an annual conference devoted to technology, education and design. Now I'm hooked. Their site contains hundreds of archived talks from some of the world's premiere thinkers and doers. One of the most inspiring talks on the site is by Jill Bolte Taylor, a brain scientist who had a massive stroke and was able to watch and experience as her brain functions shut down one by one. It's a pretty amazing story and gives insight into just how complicated the brain is. Often it's not until something goes wrong that we think about brain health, and how it's just as important to keep our brains healthy as it is to keep our bodies healthy.
When the brain is not working properly or is working in the wrong way, a person may experience difficulty thinking or focusing attention, extreme emotional highs and lows, or sleep problems. When these symptoms significantly disrupt a person’s life, we say that the person has a mental disorder or a mental illness.
While we know that mental disorders are brain disorders, Jill Bolte Taylor's story is an example that brain problems do not always indicate mental illness.
~ D. Venn
Blog Tag Cloud
adhd anxiety disorders attention award awards behaviour bipolar blog brain & neurology bullying canada care carter center conference confidentiality control coping criminal justice system cruelty cutting depression discrimination doctor driving eating disordersRecent Comment
This is a great set of comments and rings very true.
I totally agree that scientists (just like everyone else) have their biases and foibles. After all, scientists are human beings too! But science is different than scientists.
The scientific method is the most objective frame that we have by which to evaluate and predict. Science is not about finding truth. It is only about being less wrong most of the time. The scientific method (experimental design and mathematics) gives us the ability to test what we believe. The scientific method is not used to prove something is correct, on the contrary, the scientific method is designed to prove that something is not correct! It is designed to test what is called the “null hypothesis”. It takes ideas that come out of left field (or wherever else they come from) and puts those ideas to an independent test.
t does not drive our beliefs. It does however challenge our beliefs. In that way it is self-correcting. Of course scientific inquiry and understanding lives within a wider social context. That is one of the great features of science.
But gravity is gravity, social context notwithstanding. And thus it is nasty, brutish and long. As Brecht said, (something like this) - the purpose of science is to save us from everlasting error.
By Christina Carew on May 11th
You can find us here too!
We would like to say thanks...
Without their help this initiative would not be possible. Thanks for you help.
Be the first to leave a comment
What do you think?